Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Gardner
Norfolk & W. Ry. Co. v. Gardner, 489 U.S. 1016 (1989)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1989-02-21
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that because state imposed substantial restrictions on state trooper's lunch arrangements, lunch expenses were deductible as "ordinary and necessary" business expenses under general provisions of Sec. 162(a)
- holding that because state imposed substantial restrictions on state trooper’s lunch arrangements, lunch expenses were deductible as “ordinary and necessary” business expenses under general provisions of § 162(a)
- standing merely requires the party to make allegations of a colorable claim of injury to an interest which is arguably protected or regulated by the statute or constitutional guarantee
- standing merely requires the party to make allegations of a colorable claim of iiyury to an interest which is arguably protected or regulated by the statute or constitutional guarantee
- “the state bears the burden of disproving [duress and entrapment] once they are raised by the presentation of some evidence supporting them”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Gardner. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 73 opinions
Sup. Ct. App. W. Va. Certiorari denied.