Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Buljubasic v. United States
Buljubasic v. United States, 484 U.S. 815 (1987)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1987-10-05
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that the defendant’s silence constituted consent when judge proposed mistrial and invited comments Xemphasis added
- “Finger-pointing is an acceptable cost of the joint trial and at times is even beneficial because it helps complete the picture before the trier of fact”
- considering application for EAJA attorney fees by union that had represented employee
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Buljubasic v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 84 opinions
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.