Falcon Insurance Co. v. Eli Lilly & Co.

How later courts describe this case

• weighing competing interests in determining validity of time, place and manner restrictions on speech
• “Indiana ... has a strong additional interest [in the insurance coverage dispute] because it is [the insured’s] principal place of business and place of incorporation.”
• a corporation is “doing business" under § 1391(c) whenever the Constitution would permit a state to require a foreign corporation to comply with a licensing scheme
• policy ambiguous if reasonable persons may honestly differ as to meaning of policy language
• “[T]he Supremacy Clause, standing alone, secures federal rights only in the sense that it establishes federal-state priorities; it does not create individual rights, nor does it secure such rights within the meaning of 42 U.S.C.S. § 1983.”