Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Rosener
450 U.S. 1051
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1981-04-08
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- where “appellant’s wrongdoing clearly contained elements of intentional malfeasance and bad faith,” damages for emotional distress and mental suffering were permissible on a claim for fraud
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Rosener. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 5 opinions
Appeal from Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist., dismissed under this Court’s Rule 53.