Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

City of Atlanta v. Ickes

City of Atlanta v. Ickes, 308 U.S. 517 (1939)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1939-11-13
Topic
general

Per Curiam: The judgment is affirmed on the ground that the appellant has no standing to maintain the suit. Tennessee Power Co. v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 306 U. S. 118, 142; Alabama Power Co. v. Ickes, 302 U.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed City of Atlanta v. Ickes. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
18 opinions
Per Curiam:

The judgment is affirmed on the ground that the appellant has no standing to maintain the suit. Tennessee Power Co. v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 306 U. S. 118, 142; Alabama Power Co. v. Ickes, 302 U. S. 464,-478-479; Sprunt & Son v. United States, 281 U. S. 249, 255-256; Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. Haworth, 300 U. S. 227, 240-241.