Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

City of Atlanta v. Ickes

308 U.S. 517

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1939-11-13
Topic
general

Per Curiam: The judgment is affirmed on the ground that the appellant has no standing to maintain the suit. Tennessee Power Co. v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 306 U. S. 118, 142; Alabama Power Co. v. Ickes, 302 U.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed City of Atlanta v. Ickes. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
18 opinions
Per Curiam:

The judgment is affirmed on the ground that the appellant has no standing to maintain the suit. Tennessee Power Co. v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 306 U. S. 118, 142; Alabama Power Co. v. Ickes, 302 U. S. 464,-478-479; Sprunt & Son v. United States, 281 U. S. 249, 255-256; Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. Haworth, 300 U. S. 227, 240-241.