Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Commonwealth v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.
Commonwealth v. Tap Pharm. Prods., Inc., 626 PA 25 (Pa. 2014)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- Jurisdiction
- Pennsylvania
- Date
- 2014-06-16
- Topic
- general
Justice BAER, concurring. I concur in the Court’s order vacating the Commonwealth Court’s order and remanding for the reasons set forth in my concurring opinion in Commonwealth v. TAP Pharm. Prods. Inc., — Pa.-, 94 A.8d 350, 2014 WL 2728008 (Pa.2014) (Baer, J. concurring)(indieating my view that a remand is warranted for further consideration of the case in light of the OAJC’s analysis of the rebate issue).
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Commonwealth v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
concurring.
I concur in the Court’s order vacating the Commonwealth Court’s order and remanding for the reasons set forth in my concurring opinion in Commonwealth v. TAP Pharm. Prods. Inc., — Pa.-, 94 A.8d 350, 2014 WL 2728008 (Pa.2014) (Baer, J. concurring)(indieating my view that a remand is warranted for further consideration of the case in light of the OAJC’s analysis of the rebate issue).
Justices TODD and McCAFFERY join this concurring statement.