Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Commonwealth v. Cruttenden
Commonwealth v. Cruttenden, 610 PA 454 (Pa. 2011)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- Jurisdiction
- Pennsylvania
- Date
- 2011-06-16
- Topic
- general
ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 16th day of June, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal i: GRANTED. The issue, as presented by Petitioner, is: Does a police officer violate the Wiretap Act by pretending to be an accomplice and communicating directly with a suspect by text messaging?
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Commonwealth v. Cruttenden. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.AND NOW, this 16th day of June, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal i: GRANTED. The issue, as presented by Petitioner, is:
Does a police officer violate the Wiretap Act by pretending to be an accomplice and communicating directly with a suspect by text messaging?