Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Peak v. Keystone Insurance Company
Peak v. Keystone Ins. Co., 598 PA 750 (Pa. 2008)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- Jurisdiction
- Pennsylvania
- Date
- 2008-07-02
- Topic
- general
CAROL A. PEAK, ADMINISTRATOR AND INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HER OWN RIGHT, AND RALPH PEAK, ADMINISTRATOR AND INDIVIDUALLY, AND IN HIS OWN RIGHT, AND THE ESTATE OF SHERRY ANN PEAK, DECEASED, AND CAROL A. PEAK, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF VIOLA CRISCITO, DECEASED, Petitioners v. KEYSTONE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent No. 98 WAL 2008. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Peak v. Keystone Insurance Company. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
CAROL A. PEAK, ADMINISTRATOR AND INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HER OWN RIGHT, AND RALPH PEAK, ADMINISTRATOR AND INDIVIDUALLY, AND IN HIS OWN RIGHT, AND THE ESTATE OF SHERRY ANN PEAK, DECEASED, AND CAROL A. PEAK, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF VIOLA CRISCITO, DECEASED, Petitioners
v.
KEYSTONE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent
No. 98 WAL 2008.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District.
July 2, 2008.ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 2nd day of July 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
Mr. Justice McCaffery did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.