Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Marcone

Off. of Disciplinary Counsel v. Marcone, 579 PA 650 (Pa. 2004)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction
Pennsylvania
Date
2004-09-10
Topic
general

ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 10th day of September, 2004, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated January 26, 2004, the Exceptions to the Report and Recommendations and Answer thereto, it is hereby *651ORDERED that Frank J. Marcone be and he is suspended from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of five years, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule' 217, Pa.R.D.E. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E. Justice NIGRO dissents as he would disbar respondent.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Marcone. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 10th day of September, 2004, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated January 26, 2004, the Exceptions to the Report and Recommendations and Answer thereto, it is hereby

*651 ORDERED that Frank J. Marcone be and he is suspended from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of five years, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule' 217, Pa.R.D.E. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Justice NIGRO dissents as he would disbar respondent.