Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Petraglia v. American Motorists Insurance Company

498 Pa. 32

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction
Pennsylvania
Date
1982-04-30
Topic
bankruptcy

How later courts describe this case

  • holding one-year limitation on actions arising under insurance policy is valid and enforceable
  • one-year limitation on actions arising under insurance policy is valid and enforceable

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Petraglia v. American Motorists Insurance Company. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
16 opinions
498 Pa. 32 (1982) 444 A.2d 653

Paul PETRAGLIA, Appellant,
v.
AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued September 15, 1981. Decided April 30, 1982.

Richard D. Gilardi, Alfred S. Pelaez, Gilardi & Cooper, P.A., Pittsburgh, for appellant.

Charles Kirshner, Pittsburgh, for appellee.

Before O'BRIEN, C.J., and ROBERTS, NIX, LARSEN and FLAHERTY, JJ.

*33 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Order, 284 Pa.Super. 1, 424 A.2d 1360, Affirmed. See Schreiber v. Pennsylvania Lumberman's Mutual Insurance Co., 498 Pa. 21, 444 A.2d 647 (1982).

NIX, J., files a concurring opinion.

KAUFFMAN and WILKINSON, JJ., did not participate in the decision of this case.

NIX, Justice, concurring.

The record in this case does not present a situation warranting equitable intervention; see, e.g., Schreiber v. Pennsylvania Lumberman's Mutual Insurance Company, 498 Pa. 21, 26, 444 A.2d 647, 649 (1982) (Nix, J. dissenting). Therefore I concur in the result.