Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Sheridan v. HORN & HARDART BAK. CO.
366 Pa. 485
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- Jurisdiction
- Pennsylvania
- Date
- 1951-01-02
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- finding defendant had no notice of the conditions and plaintiff was contributorily negligent in negligence claim for slip and fall in wet, slushy revolving door of restaurant
- nonsuit affirmed where no evidence, apart from description of general weather conditions, of how long wet and slushy condition of entryway had existed
- plaintiff walked on freshly-mopped floor
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Sheridan v. HORN & HARDART BAK. CO.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 23 opinions
366 Pa. 485 (1951)
Sheridan, Appellant,
Sheridan, Appellant,
v.
Horn & Hardart Baking Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued November 13, 1950. January 2, 1951.*486 Before DREW, C.J., STEARNE, JONES, LADNER and CHIDSEY, JJ.
*488 Conrad G. Moffett, with him George T. Guarnieri, for appellant.
John J. McDevitt, 3rd, with him Peter P. Liebert, 3rd, for appellee.
OPINION PER CURIAM, January 2, 1951:
Order affirmed on the opinion of the learned court below.