Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Rohrer v. Milk Control Board

322 Pa. 257

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction
Pennsylvania
Date
1936-05-25
Topic
antitrust

How later courts describe this case

  • adopting the Superior Court dissent as this Court’s opinion

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Rohrer v. Milk Control Board. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
90 opinions

Opinion by

Me. Chief Justice Kephart,

The majority of the members of this court, Mr. Justice Schaffer and Mr. Justice Drew dissenting, agree *282 that the decision certified to us by the Superior Court should be reversed on the dissenting opinion written by President Judge Keller of that court, reported in 121 Pa. Superior Ct. 281. Mr. Justice Schaffer and Mr. Justice Drew are of opinion that the decision of the Superior Court should be affirmed on the opinion of Judge Parker of that court.

Judgment reversed.