Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Siter, James & Co.'s Appeal
26 Pa. 178
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- Jurisdiction
- Pennsylvania
- Date
- 1856-07-01
- Topic
- bankruptcy
*184The opinion of the court was delivered by Woodward, J. The learned arid able argument of, the appellants’ counsel has failed to shake the conclusions of the auditor, and we adopt them, with the reasons given by the auditor, as the law of this case. The decree of distribution is affirmed.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Siter, James & Co.'s Appeal. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 10 opinions
The learned arid able argument of, the appellants’ counsel has failed to shake the conclusions of the auditor, and we adopt them, with the reasons given by the auditor, as the law of this case.
The decree of distribution is affirmed.