Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Diamond National Bank

194 Pa. 334

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction
Pennsylvania
Date
1900-01-02
Topic
general

Pee Curiam, Upon the checks which were received by the administrator he had the undoubted right to draw the money and, if he chose, thereupon to deposit the money thus received to the credit of his own account, he had a perfect right to do so. What he did do was nothing more than the equivalent of such action on his part. The money having gone into his own account was subject to be drawn out upon his personal checks which the bank could not refuse to pay. The question is entirely different from the one which would arise if after the deposit was made it was claimed as money of the trust and the bank was notified of the claim before it was paid, but that is not this case. Judgment affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Diamond National Bank. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
11 opinions
Pee Curiam,

Upon the checks which were received by the administrator he had the undoubted right to draw the money and, if he chose, thereupon to deposit the money thus received to the credit of his own account, he had a perfect right to do so. What he did do was nothing more than the equivalent of such action on his part. The money having gone into his own account was subject to be drawn out upon his personal checks which the bank could not refuse to pay. The question is entirely different from the one which would arise if after the deposit was made it was claimed as money of the trust and the bank was notified of the claim before it was paid, but that is not this case.

Judgment affirmed.