Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

STATE v. AGUILAR, 321 Or. 378 (1995)

STATE OF Or., Respondent on Rev., v. JENARO AGUILAR, Petitioner onReview., 899 P.2d 690 (Or. 1995)

Type
Opinion
Court
Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction
Orlaw
Date
1995-07-20
Topic
general

STATE v. AGUILAR, 321 Or. 378 (1995) 899 P.2d 690 STATE OF OREGON, Respondent on Review, v. JENARO AGUILAR, Petitioner onReview. CC C88-06-33882; CA A70129; SC S41243Oregon Supreme Court.Submitted on petition for review April 19, 1994, Petition for review allowed;Decision of the Court of Appeals reversed,Case remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration July 20, 1995 On review from the Court of Appeals.[fn*] [fn*] Appeal from Multnomah County Circuit Court, Janice R. Wilson, Judge. 126 Or.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. AGUILAR, 321 Or. 378 (1995). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STATE v. AGUILAR,321 Or. 378(1995)
899 P.2d 690
STATE OF OREGON,Respondent on Review,v. JENARO AGUILAR,Petitioner on
Review.
CC C88-06-33882; CA A70129; SC S41243
Oregon Supreme Court.
Submitted on petition for review April 19, 1994,
Petition for review allowed;
Decision of the Court of Appeals reversed,
Case remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration July 20, 1995
On review from the Court of Appeals.fn*
Liza Langford, Portland, filed the petition for petitioner on review.

No appearancecontra.
Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Fadeley, Unis, and Graber, Justices.fn**
MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in the light ofState v.Dominguez-Martinez,321 Or. 206,895 P.2d 306(1995).Page 379
  1. Appeal from Multnomah County Circuit Court, Janice R. Wilson, Judge.126 Or. App. 22,867 P.2d 520(1994). ↩
  2. Durham, J., did not participate in this decision. ↩