Opinion · Court of Appeals of Oregon
State v. Stewart
State v. Stewart, 126 Or. App. 456 (Or. Ct. App. 1994)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals of Oregon
- Jurisdiction
- Oregon
- Date
- 1994-02-23
- Topic
- general
RIGGS, J. The state seeks reconsideration of our opinion in State v. Stewart, 123 Or App 147, 859 P2d 545 (1993), because the last two paragraphs of the opinion are inconsistent with one another. The state is correct. Defendant’s last assignment of error was not preserved.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Stewart. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 13 opinions
The state seeks reconsideration of our opinion in State v. Stewart, 123 Or App 147, 859 P2d 545 (1993), because the last two paragraphs of the opinion are inconsistent with one another. The state is correct. Defendant’s last assignment of error was not preserved. State v. Farmer, 317 Or 220, 224, 856 P2d 623 (1993). Accordingly, we modify the opinion to withdraw the paragraph in which we considered that assignment.
Reconsideration allowed; opinion modified and adhered to as modified.