Opinion · Oregon Supreme Court

Dynagraphics, Inc. v. United States National Bank

Dynagraphics, Inc. v. United States Nat’l Bank, 310 Or. 120 (Or. 1990)

Type
Opinion
Court
Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Oregon
Date
1990-06-21
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • where the jury returns special interrogatories in a plaintiffs favor on two claims with identical or overlapping damages, “[a] proper verdict on either claim would independently support the judgment”
  • where identical and overlapping damages are awarded on alternate theories of liability, the verdict on either claim is independently adequate to support the judgment
  • where plaintiff received “identical and overlapping damages” on both a negligence and a contract claim, it was only necessary to address one of those claims because “[a] proper verdict on either claim would independently support the judgment”
  • where the plaintiff received "identical and overlapping damages" on both a negligence claim and a contract claim, it was only necessary to address one of those claims because "[a] proper verdict on either claim would independently support the judgment"

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Dynagraphics, Inc. v. United States National Bank. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
7 opinions

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Petition for review dismissed as improvidently allowed.