Opinion · Washington Supreme Court
State v. Sanders
State v. Sanders, 192 Wash. 2d 1025 (Wash. 2019)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Washington Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Washington
- Date
- 2019-03-06
- Topic
- general
¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins and Gordon McCloud, considered at its March 5, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered. ¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED: ¶ 3 That the petition for review is denied. For the Court /s/ Fairhurst, CJ. CHIEF JUSTICE
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Sanders. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins and Gordon McCloud, considered at its March 5, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.
¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:
¶ 3 That the petition for review is denied.
For the Court
/s/ Fairhurst, CJ. CHIEF JUSTICE