Opinion · Court of Appeals of Oregon

Murphy v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

140 Or. App. 642

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Jurisdiction
Oregon
Date
1996-05-01
Topic
general

PER CURIAM Petitioner seeks judicial review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision that rescinded his parole release date. He contends that the Board violated applicable law by failing to hold a hearing before issuing the order. He asks us to reverse the order and to remand with specific instructions that the Board release petitioner. We agree with petitioner that the Board violated an applicable rule by failing to hold a hearing prior to issuing its order. We decline, however, to grant petitioner the relief that he seeks.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Murphy v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
3 opinions
PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks judicial review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision that rescinded his parole release date. He contends that the Board violated applicable law by failing to hold a hearing before issuing the order. He asks us to reverse the order and to remand with specific instructions that the Board release petitioner.

We agree with petitioner that the Board violated an applicable rule by failing to hold a hearing prior to issuing its order. We decline, however, to grant petitioner the relief that he seeks. The only relief to which petitioner is entitled is a hearing to determine if he should be released, and the Board held such a hearing after the order on review. Because petitioner has been accorded a full hearing, no further relief remains to be granted. See, e.g., Floyd v. Motor Vehicles Div., 27 Or App 41, 44-45, 554 P2d 1024, rev den 276 Or 873 (1976).

Affirmed.