Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

STATE v. McCAIN, 137 Or. App. 279 (1995)

903 P.2d 416

Type: Opinion
Court: Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction: Orlaw
Date: 1995-10-11
Topic: general

STATE v. McCAIN, 137 Or. App. 279 (1995) 903 P.2d 416 STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ROBIN E. McCAIN, Appellant.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. McCAIN, 137 Or. App. 279 (1995). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STATE v. McCAIN,137 Or. App. 279(1995)

903 P.2d 416

STATE OF OREGON,Respondent,v. ROBIN E. McCAIN,Appellant.

CR32539; CA A84991

Oregon Court of Appeals.

Argued and submitted March 30, 1995.

Affirmed October 11, 1995.

Appeal from District Court, Deschutes County, Barbara A. Haslinger, Judge.

Andy Simrin, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.

Jonathan H. Fussner, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Armstrong, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed.State v. Prickett,136 Or. App. 559,902 P.2d 621(1995);State v. Conner,132 Or. App. 478,888 P.2d 1087,mod133 Or. App. 594,891 P.2d 1384(1995).Page 280