Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

STATE v. DOWN, 122 Or. App. 416 (1993)

STATE OF Or., Respondent, v. MARK ANTHONY DOWN, Appellant., 856 P.2d 645 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)

Type
Opinion
Court
Oregon
Jurisdiction
Oregon
Date
1993-12-21
Topic
general

STATE v. DOWN, 122 Or. App. 416 (1993) 856 P.2d 645 STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MARK ANTHONY DOWN, Appellant. 91C-20972; CA A73663Oregon Court of Appeals. Argued and submitted March 31, affirmed August 18, reconsideration deniedOctober 27, petition for review denied December 21, 1993 (318 Or. 246) Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion County.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. DOWN, 122 Or. App. 416 (1993). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STATE v. DOWN,122 Or. App. 416(1993)
856 P.2d 645
STATE OF OREGON,Respondent,v. MARK ANTHONY DOWN,Appellant.
91C-20972; CA A73663
Oregon Court of Appeals.
Argued and submitted March 31, affirmed August 18, reconsideration denied
October 27, petition for review denied December 21, 1993 (318 Or. 246)
Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion County.

Duane R. Ertsgaard, Judge.
Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Amy E. Alpaugh, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and Edmonds, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Affirmed.Page 417

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE IS BLANK.]Page 418
PER CURIAM
Defendant was convicted of three counts of robbery in the first degree, ORS164.415, after he entered into a plea agreement. Defendant appeals, arguing that the court erred in calculating his criminal history. Under ORS138.222(2)(d), we may not review his claim of error.See State v. Adams,315 Or. 359,847 P.2d 397(1993);State v. Kilborn,120 Or. App. 462,852 P.2d 935(1993);State v. Johnston,120 Or. App. 165,851 P.2d 1156(1993).

Affirmed.Page 419