Opinion · Orlaw Oregon
STATE v. LITTLE, 79 Or. App. 531 (1986)
STATE OF Or., Respondent, v. GEORGE EDWIN LITTLE, Appellant.(Cases Consolidated), 719 P.2d 518 (Or. Ct. App. 1986)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Orlaw Oregon
- Jurisdiction
- Orlaw
- Date
- 1986-05-29
- Topic
- general
STATE v. LITTLE, 79 Or. App. 531 (1986) 719 P.2d 518 STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. GEORGE EDWIN LITTLE, Appellant.(Cases Consolidated) MC83-1470, MC83-1471; CA A36589Oregon Court of Appeals.Argued and submitted February 7, 1986. Affirmed as modified May 29, 1986.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. LITTLE, 79 Or. App. 531 (1986). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
STATE v. LITTLE,79 Or. App. 531(1986)
719 P.2d 518
STATE OF OREGON,Respondent,v. GEORGE EDWIN LITTLE,Appellant.
(Cases Consolidated)
MC83-1470, MC83-1471; CA A36589
Oregon Court of Appeals.
Argued and submitted February 7, 1986.
Affirmed as modified May 29, 1986.
David Schuman, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Joseph, Chief Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Young, Judges.
Order modified by deleting reimbursement for attorney fees; affirmed as modified.Page 532
Order modified by deleting reimbursement for attorney fees; affirmed as modified.Page 533