Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

SPACKMAN v. SCHULZ, 77 Or. App. 724 (1986)

714 P.2d 284

Type
Opinion
Court
Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction
Orlaw
Date
1986-02-19
Topic
general

SPACKMAN v. SCHULZ, 77 Or. App. 724 (1986) 714 P.2d 284 SPACKMAN et al, Respondents, v. SCHULZ et al, Appellants. 80-3174; CA A32149Oregon Court of Appeals.Argued and submitted July 3, 1985. Judgment modified to delete award of attorney fees to plaintiffJimelcrete, Inc.; otherwise affirmed February 19, 1986.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed SPACKMAN v. SCHULZ, 77 Or. App. 724 (1986). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

SPACKMAN v. SCHULZ,77 Or. App. 724(1986)
714 P.2d 284
SPACKMAN et al,Respondents,v. SCHULZ et al,Appellants.
80-3174; CA A32149
Oregon Court of Appeals.
Argued and submitted July 3, 1985.
Judgment modified to delete award of attorney fees to plaintiff
Jimelcrete, Inc.; otherwise affirmed February 19, 1986.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Douglas County, Charles S. Woodrich, Judge.
Robert W. Nowack, Roseburg, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellants.

John H. Horn, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Newman, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Judgment modified to delete award of attorney fees to plaintiff Jimelcrete, Inc.; otherwise affirmed.Page 725
PER CURIAM
Defendants appeal from a judgment declaring that plaintiffs have easements over their property. The action was for declaratory relief and reformation. Our review isde novo.

Plaintiffs claim that they are entitled to easements for utilities and access, appurtenant to the several parcels of land that they own, across defendants' property. Plaintiffs claim easements of record, implied easements by reservation and reformation. The court held, and we agree, that plaintiffs are entitled to the easements that they sought. Although not all the easements were of record at the time when defendants purchased their property, the evidence supports plaintiffs' claims of implied easements and reformation. We modify the judgment, however, to delete the award of attorney fees, which all parties agree was incorrect, to plaintiff Jimelcrete, Inc., and otherwise affirm the judgment, including the award of $7500 attorney fees to the other plaintiffs.

Judgment modified to delete award of attorney fees to plaintiff Jimelcrete, Inc.; otherwise affirmed.Page 726