Opinion · Orlaw Oregon
STATE v. COX, 71 Or. App. 651 (1985)
693 P.2d 1320
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Orlaw Oregon
- Jurisdiction
- Orlaw
- Date
- 1985-03-19
- Topic
- general
STATE v. COX, 71 Or. App. 651 (1985) 693 P.2d 1320 STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DARRELL DEAN COX, Appellant.(Cases Consolidated) 10-82-00339, 10-82-00340, 10-82-05485, 10-83-02744;CA A29430 (Control), A29431, A29432, A29433Oregon Court of Appeals.Argued and submitted December 20, 1984 Convictions affirmed, sentences vacated, remanded forresentencing January 16, 1985Reconsideration denied February 22, 1985Petition for review denied March 19, 1985 (298 Or. 822) Appeal from Circuit Court, Lane County. Roland K.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. COX, 71 Or. App. 651 (1985). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
STATE v. COX,71 Or. App. 651(1985)
693 P.2d 1320
STATE OF OREGON,Respondent,v. DARRELL DEAN COX,Appellant.
(Cases Consolidated)
10-82-00339, 10-82-00340, 10-82-05485, 10-83-02744;
CA A29430 (Control), A29431, A29432, A29433
Oregon Court of Appeals.
Argued and submitted December 20, 1984
Convictions affirmed, sentences vacated, remanded for
resentencing January 16, 1985
Reconsideration denied February 22, 1985
Petition for review denied March 19, 1985 (298 Or. 822)
Roland K. Rodman, Judge.
Philip Schradle, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Young, Judges.
Convictions affirmed; sentences vacated; remanded for resentencing.Page 652
Convictions affirmed; sentences vacated; remanded for resentencing.Page 653