Opinion · Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Harris

70 Or. App. 353

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Jurisdiction
Oregon
Date
1984-10-17
Topic
litigation

PER CURIAM It is doubtful whether defendant’s exception to the jury’s instruction was sufficient to raise the question urged on appeal. Assuming that it was sufficient, the judgment is affirmed. State v. Kohlasch, 11 Or App 459, 502 P2d 1158 (1972). Affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Harris. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
2 opinions
PER CURIAM

It is doubtful whether defendant’s exception to the jury’s instruction was sufficient to raise the question urged on appeal. Assuming that it was sufficient, the judgment is affirmed. State v. Kohlasch, 11 Or App 459, 502 P2d 1158 (1972).

Affirmed.