Opinion · Court of Appeals of Oregon
State v. Sparks
State v. Sparks, 675 P.2d 191 (Or. Ct. App. 1984)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals of Oregon
- Jurisdiction
- Oregon
- Date
- 1984-02-01
- Topic
- litigation
675 P.2d 191 (1984) 66 Or.App. 974 STATE of Oregon, Appellant, v. Thomas Paul SPARKS, Respondent. No. 23876; A27965. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted October 10, 1983.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Sparks. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
STATE of Oregon, Appellant,
v.
Thomas Paul SPARKS, Respondent.
No. 23876; A27965.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Argued and Submitted October 10, 1983. Decided February 1, 1984.Stephen F. Peifer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Deputy Sol. Gen., Salem.
John Henry Hingson, III, Oregon City, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.
Before GILLETTE, P.J., and WARDEN and YOUNG, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Reversed. State v. Smith, 66 Or. App. 703, 675 P.2d 510 (1984).