Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

STATE v. REID, 62 Or. App. 466 (1983)

660 P.2d 1099

Type
Opinion
Court
Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction
Orlaw
Date
1983-04-06
Topic
general

STATE v. REID, 62 Or. App. 466 (1983) 660 P.2d 1099 STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. LARRY G. REID, Appellant.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. REID, 62 Or. App. 466 (1983). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STATE v. REID,62 Or. App. 466(1983)
660 P.2d 1099
STATE OF OREGON,Respondent,v. LARRY G. REID,Appellant.
CR 82-489; CA A26222
Oregon Court of Appeals.
Submitted on record and briefs March 16, 1983
Reversed and remanded with instructions April 6, 1983
Appeal from District Court, Polk County, Walter W. Foster, Judge.
R. Michael Ross, Monmouth, filed the brief for appellant.

Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, William F. Gary, Solicitor General, and Robert E. Barton, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Young, Judges.
PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded with instructions to grant defendant's motion to suppress.Page 467
PER CURIAM
This is a criminal case in which defendant was convicted of driving while his operator's license was suspended. ORS487.560. On appeal, his sole assignment of error is that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress certain evidence. The state concedes error on this point.

Reversed and remanded with instructions to grant defendant's motion to suppress.Page 468