Opinion · Court of Appeals of Oregon
State v. Houghton
61 Or. App. 228
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals of Oregon
- Jurisdiction
- Oregon
- Date
- 1983-01-05
- Topic
- general
PER CURIAM. Defendant in this theft case appeals from the trial court’s order of restitution, maintaining that a portion of the amount he is ordered to repay to his former employer is not supported by the record. We agree. Reversed and remanded for resentencing, with instructions to delete any restitution other than $4.15 per hour for hours of work claimed but not performed.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Houghton. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
Defendant in this theft case appeals from the trial court’s order of restitution, maintaining that a portion of the amount he is ordered to repay to his former employer is not supported by the record. We agree. Reversed and remanded for resentencing, with instructions to delete any restitution other than $4.15 per hour for hours of work claimed but not performed.