Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

MATHEWS v. MATHEWS, 60 Or. App. 163 (1982)

652 P.2d 382

Type
Opinion
Court
Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction
Orlaw
Date
1982-11-03
Topic
general

MATHEWS v. MATHEWS, 60 Or. App. 163 (1982) 652 P.2d 382 In the Matter of the Marriage of MATHEWS, Appellant, and MATHEWS,Respondent. No. 81-3-308, CA A24024Oregon Court of Appeals.Argued and submitted October 22, 1982. Affirmed as modified November 3, 1982.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MATHEWS v. MATHEWS, 60 Or. App. 163 (1982). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MATHEWS v. MATHEWS,60 Or. App. 163(1982)
652 P.2d 382
In the Matter of the Marriage of MATHEWS,Appellant,and MATHEWS,
Respondent.
No. 81-3-308, CA A24024
Oregon Court of Appeals.
Argued and submitted October 22, 1982.
Affirmed as modified November 3, 1982.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Umatilla County, Jack Olsen, Judge.
Samuel E. Tucker, Milton-Freewater, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Monahan, Grove Tucker, Milton-Freewater.

Robert W. Collins, Jr., Pendleton, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Collins Collins, Pendleton.
Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Young, Judges.
PER CURIAM.

Decree modified to award petitioner title to California property, to require petitioner to hold respondent harmless with respect to the first mortgage on the California property, and to require respondent to hold petitioner harmless with respect to the second mortgage on the California property; affirmed as modified. No costs to either party.Page 164
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal by wife from certain provisions of a dissolution decree relating to the division of the marital estate and to spousal support.

1. Paragraphs 10 and 11 of the decree are stricken and the following paragraphs are substituted:
"10. The parties' property at 3710 Duffy Way, Bonita, California, is awarded to petitioner, subject to the first mortgage to Home Savings and Loan in the amount of $31,649.63. Respondent shall assume the second mortgage, payable to North Island Federal Credit Union.
"11. The first mortgage mentioned in paragraph 10 of this decree shall be the sole obligation of petitioner, and respondent shall be held harmless therefrom. The second mortgage mentioned in paragraph 10 of this decree shall be the sole obligation of respondent, and petitioner shall be held harmless therefrom."


The decree is modified in the foregoing respects and, as modified, is affirmed. No costs to either party.Page 165