Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

STATE EX REL JUV. DEPT. v. SALERNO, 59 Or. App. 123 (1982)

In the Matter of Salerno, JoAnn, a Child.STATE ex rel JUVENILE Dep’t OF MULTNOMAH COUNTY, Respondent, v.SALERNO, Appellant., 650 P.2d 189 (Or. Ct. App. 1982)

Type
Opinion
Court
Oregon
Jurisdiction
Oregon
Date
1982-01-01
Topic
general

STATE EX REL JUV. DEPT. v. SALERNO, 59 Or. App. 123 (1982) 650 P.2d 189 In the Matter of Salerno, JoAnn, a Child.STATE ex rel JUVENILE DEPARTMENT OF MULTNOMAH COUNTY, Respondent, v.SALERNO, Appellant. No. 67,209, CA A21594Oregon Court of Appeals.On appellant's reconsideration filed April 12, 1982 reconsideration granted.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE EX REL JUV. DEPT. v. SALERNO, 59 Or. App. 123 (1982). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STATE EX REL JUV. DEPT. v. SALERNO,59 Or. App. 123(1982)
650 P.2d 189
In the Matter of Salerno, JoAnn, a Child.
STATE ex rel JUVENILE DEPARTMENT OF MULTNOMAH COUNTY,Respondent,v.
SALERNO,Appellant.
No. 67,209, CA A21594
Oregon Court of Appeals.
On appellant's reconsideration filed April 12, 1982 reconsideration granted.
Former opinion filed March 15 (56 Or. App. 592, 643 P.2d 424) adhered to
September 8, 1982.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County, Harlow F. Lenon, Judge.
Steven M. Rose, Portland, for petition.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Thornton and Van Hoomissen, Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Petition for reconsideration granted; former opinion adhered to.
Page 124
PER CURIAM
Father petitions for reconsideration of our decision affirming the order terminating his parental rights in his son,56 Or. App. 592,643 P.2d 424(1982). Pursuant toState ex relJuv. Dept. v. Farrell,58 Or. App. 258,648 P.2d 401(1982), we have reviewed the record consistently with the proper burden of proof. The petition is granted, and we adhere to our prior decision.Page 125