Opinion · Court of Appeals of Oregon
State v. Butler
State v. Butler, 56 Or. App. 855 (Or. Ct. App. 1982)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals of Oregon
- Jurisdiction
- Oregon
- Date
- 1982-04-19
- Topic
- general
PER CURIAM The state concedes that the trial court erred when it refused to schedule a hearing, on defendant’s request, on the imposition of restitution, ORS 137.106(3), and delegated to the probation officer the responsibility for determining the amount of restitution required and the payment schedule. State v. Randolph, 49 Or App 399, 619 P2d 680 (1980). Sentence vacated and cause remanded for resentencing, with instructions to schedule a hearing on the imposition of restitution.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Butler. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
The state concedes that the trial court erred when it refused to schedule a hearing, on defendant’s request, on the imposition of restitution, ORS 137.106(3), and delegated to the probation officer the responsibility for determining the amount of restitution required and the payment schedule. State v. Randolph, 49 Or App 399, 619 P2d 680 (1980).
Sentence vacated and cause remanded for resentencing, with instructions to schedule a hearing on the imposition of restitution.