Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

STATE v. SCOTT, 56 Or. App. 4 (1982)

640 P.2d 709

Type
Opinion
Court
Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction
Orlaw
Date
1982-02-16
Topic
general

STATE v. SCOTT, 56 Or. App. 4 (1982) 640 P.2d 709 In the Matter of Richard Lee Scott, Alleged to be a Mentally RetardedPerson. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. RICHARD LEE SCOTT, Appellant.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. SCOTT, 56 Or. App. 4 (1982). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STATE v. SCOTT,56 Or. App. 4(1982)
640 P.2d 709
In the Matter of Richard Lee Scott, Alleged to be a Mentally Retarded
Person. STATE OF OREGON,Respondent,v. RICHARD LEE SCOTT,Appellant.
No. 1252, CA A21572
Oregon Court of Appeals.
Argued and submitted January 15, 1982
Modified February 16, 1982
Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion County.

Duane R. Ertsgaard, Judge.
Steven H. Gorham, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Christine L. Dickey, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and William F. Gary, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Young, Judge, and Roberts, Judge Pro Tempore.
PER CURIAM

Appellant's commitment is modified to a period not to exceed one year.Page 5
PER CURIAM
The state confesses error as to the extent of the commitment imposed on appellant by the trial court. Pursuant to our authority under Or Const, Art VII (Amended), § 3, appellant's commitment to the custody of the Mental Health Division is modified to a period not to exceed one year. ORS427.290(3).Page 6