Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

STATE v. SCOTT, 56 Or. App. 4 (1982)

In the Matter of Richard Lee Scott, Alleged to be a Mentally RetardedPerson. STATE OF Or., Respondent, v. RICHARD LEE SCOTT, Appellant., 640 P.2d 709 (Or. Ct. App. 1982)

Type: Opinion
Court: Oregon
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Date: 1982-02-16
Topic: general

STATE v. SCOTT, 56 Or. App. 4 (1982) 640 P.2d 709 In the Matter of Richard Lee Scott, Alleged to be a Mentally RetardedPerson. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. RICHARD LEE SCOTT, Appellant.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. SCOTT, 56 Or. App. 4 (1982). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STATE v. SCOTT,56 Or. App. 4(1982)

640 P.2d 709

In the Matter of Richard Lee Scott, Alleged to be a Mentally Retarded

Person. STATE OF OREGON,Respondent,v. RICHARD LEE SCOTT,Appellant.

No. 1252, CA A21572

Oregon Court of Appeals.

Argued and submitted January 15, 1982

Modified February 16, 1982

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion County.

Duane R. Ertsgaard, Judge.

Steven H. Gorham, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Christine L. Dickey, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and William F. Gary, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Young, Judge, and Roberts, Judge Pro Tempore.

PER CURIAM

Appellant's commitment is modified to a period not to exceed one year.Page 5

PER CURIAM

The state confesses error as to the extent of the commitment imposed on appellant by the trial court. Pursuant to our authority under Or Const, Art VII (Amended), § 3, appellant's commitment to the custody of the Mental Health Division is modified to a period not to exceed one year. ORS427.290(3).Page 6