Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

STATE v. NOKES, 55 Or. App. 536 (1982)

STATE OF Or., Appellant, v. MICHAEL HOWARD NOKES, Respondent., 638 P.2d 1181 (Or. Ct. App. 1982)

Type
Opinion
Court
Oregon
Jurisdiction
Oregon
Date
1982-01-18
Topic
general

STATE v. NOKES, 55 Or. App. 536 (1982) 638 P.2d 1181 STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. MICHAEL HOWARD NOKES, Respondent. No. 80-24292, CA A22344Oregon Court of Appeals.Submitted January 4, 1982.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. NOKES, 55 Or. App. 536 (1982). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STATE v. NOKES,55 Or. App. 536(1982)
638 P.2d 1181
STATE OF OREGON,Appellant,v. MICHAEL HOWARD NOKES,Respondent.
No. 80-24292, CA A22344
Oregon Court of Appeals.
Submitted January 4, 1982.
January 18, 1982.
Appeal from District Court, Lane County, Winfrid K. Liepe, Judge.
Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, William F. Gary, Solicitor General, and Thomas Denney, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for appellant.

R. Scott Palmer, and Johnson, Harrang Swanson, Eugene, appeared for respondent by letter dated December 10, 1981.
Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Roberts and Young, Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The defendant confesses error. The trial court's order suppressing evidence is reversed, and the case is remanded for trial.See State v. Newton,291 Or. 788,636 P.2d 393(1981).Page 537