Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

ARNOLD v. CANTRERAS, 44 Or. App. 67 (1980)

604 P.2d 456

Type
Opinion
Court
Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction
Orlaw
Date
1980-01-14
Topic
general

ARNOLD v. CANTRERAS, 44 Or. App. 67 (1980) 604 P.2d 456 ARNOLD, Appellant, v. CANTRERAS, Respondent. No. 191-949, CA 15089Oregon Court of Appeals.Argued and submitted December 17, 1979 Appeal dismissed January 14, 1980 Appeal from District Court, Multnomah County.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed ARNOLD v. CANTRERAS, 44 Or. App. 67 (1980). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

ARNOLD v. CANTRERAS,44 Or. App. 67(1980)
604 P.2d 456
ARNOLD,Appellant,v. CANTRERAS,Respondent.
No. 191-949, CA 15089
Oregon Court of Appeals.
Argued and submitted December 17, 1979
Appeal dismissed January 14, 1980
Appeal from District Court, Multnomah County.

Anthony L. Casciato, Judge.
Robert L. Kirkman, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Warren Kirkman, Portland.

No appearance for respondent.
Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Gillette and Roberts, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Appeal dismissed.Page 68

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE IS BLANK.]Page 69
PER CURIAM
Because any decision we rendered in this case would have no effect in this proceeding, the appeal is dismissed as moot.Page 70

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE IS BLANK.]Page 71