Opinion · Oklaw Oklahoma

McNULTY v. STATE, 52 Okla. Cr. 443 (1931)

H. W. McNULTY v. STATE., 6 P.2d 1117 (Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma. 1931)

Type: Opinion
Court: Oklaw Oklahoma
Jurisdiction: Oklaw
Date: 1931-12-17
Topic: general

McNULTY v. STATE, 52 Okla. Cr. 443 (1931) 6 P.2d 1117. H. W.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed McNULTY v. STATE, 52 Okla. Cr. 443 (1931). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status: pending

McNULTY v. STATE,52 Okla. Cr. 443(1931)

6 P.2d 1117.

H. W. McNULTY v. STATE.

No. A-8214.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

December 17, 1931.

Appeal from District Court, Cleveland County; Tom P. Pace, Judge.

H. W. McNulty was convicted of grand larceny, and appeals. Affirmed.

Justin Hinshaw and Jack Page, for plaintiff in error.

J. Berry King, Atty. Gen., for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Cleveland county of grand larceny, and his punishment fixed at six months in the penitentiary.

Defendant and three others were jointly charged with stealing of the value of $226, the property of the Prairie Oil Gas Company, from an oil lease. A severance was taken, and defendant was tried separately. Judgment was entered January 24, 1931. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed. We have read the record with care, and perceive no jurisdictional nor fundamental error. The evidence sustains the judgment.

The case is affirmed.