Opinion · New Mexico Court Opinions

PEREA v. SCARBOROUGH, 79 N.M. 448 (1968)

Emiliano PEREA & Mary Jane Perea, his wife, Petitioners, v.The Honorable J. M. SCARBOROUGH, Dist. Judge, First Judicial Districtin & for the County of Santa Fe, State of N.M., & DistrictCourt, First Judicial Dist. in & for the County of Santa Fe, State ofNew Mex., Respondents., 444 P.2d 775 (N.M. 1968)

Type
Opinion
Court
New Mexico Court Opinions
Jurisdiction
New Mexico
Date
1968-09-05
Topic
general

PEREA v. SCARBOROUGH, 79 N.M. 448 (1968) 444 P.2d 775 Emiliano PEREA and Mary Jane Perea, his wife, Petitioners, v.The Honorable J. M. SCARBOROUGH, District Judge, First Judicial Districtin and for the County of Santa Fe, State of New Mexico, and DistrictCourt, First Judicial District in and for the County of Santa Fe, State ofNew Mexico, Respondents. No. 8728.Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PEREA v. SCARBOROUGH, 79 N.M. 448 (1968). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PEREA v. SCARBOROUGH,79 N.M. 448(1968)
444 P.2d 775
Emiliano PEREA and Mary Jane Perea, his wife, Petitioners, v.
The Honorable J. M. SCARBOROUGH, District Judge, First Judicial District
in and for the County of Santa Fe, State of New Mexico, and District
Court, First Judicial District in and for the County of Santa Fe, State of
New Mexico, Respondents.
No. 8728.
Supreme Court of New Mexico.
September 5, 1968.
Original Prohibition Proceeding
NOBLE and COMPTON and CARMODY, Justices, concurring; CHAVEZ, Chief Justice and MOISE, Justice, not participating.

Ordered that the petition for writ of prohibition be and the same is hereby denied.