Opinion · New Mexico Court Opinions

STATE v. LARRAZOLO, 79 N.M. 159 (1968)

441 P.2d 57

Type
Opinion
Court
New Mexico Court Opinions
Jurisdiction
New Mexico
Date
1968-06-05
Topic
general

STATE v. LARRAZOLO, 79 N.M. 159 (1968) 441 P.2d 57 STATE of New Mexico ex rel. The ATCHISON, TOPEKA and SANTA FERAILWAY COMPANY, a corporation, Petitioner v. The Honorable Paul F.LARRAZOLO, Judge of the District Court, Division VI, of the SecondJudicial District of the State of New Mexico, Respondent. No. 8690.Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. LARRAZOLO, 79 N.M. 159 (1968). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STATE v. LARRAZOLO,79 N.M. 159(1968)
441 P.2d 57
STATE of New Mexico ex rel. The ATCHISON, TOPEKA and SANTA FE
RAILWAY COMPANY, a corporation, Petitioner v. The Honorable Paul F.
LARRAZOLO, Judge of the District Court, Division VI, of the Second
Judicial District of the State of New Mexico, Respondent.
No. 8690.
Supreme Court of New Mexico.
June 5, 1968.
Original Prohibition Proceeding
NOBLE, MOISE and CARMODY, Justices, concurring. CHAVEZ, Chief Justice and COMPTON, Justice, being absent and not participating;

Ordered that the petition for Writ of Prohibition be and the same is hereby denied.Page 160