Opinion · California Supreme Court
Hampton v. Christensen
148 Cal. 729
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- California Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- California
- Date
- 1906-02-21
- Topic
- general
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 731 The opinion heretofore rendered in Department is modified by striking therefrom all of paragraph 6 down to and including the words "fees were excessive." So modified, the opinion and judgment in Department are approved and adopted as the opinion and judgment of the court in Bank. The following is the opinion rendered in Department Two November 25, 1905, omitting the paragraph stricken out: —
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Hampton v. Christensen. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 26 opinions
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 731 The opinion heretofore rendered in Department is modified by striking therefrom all of paragraph 6 down to and including the words "fees were excessive." So modified, the opinion and judgment in Department are approved and adopted as the opinion and judgment of the court in Bank.
The following is the opinion rendered in Department Two November 25, 1905, omitting the paragraph stricken out: —