Opinion · Montana Supreme Court

State v. Whaley

State v. Whaley, 16 Mont. 580 (Mont. 1895)

Type
Opinion
Court
Montana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Montana
Date
1895-09-30
Topic
general

Per Curiam. This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment convicting him of the crime of grand larceny. As stated by appellant’s counsel, precisely the same questions of procedure are involved in this case as in the case of State v. Daniel J. Whaley, ante, page 574.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Whaley. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment convicting him of the crime of grand larceny.

As stated by appellant’s counsel, precisely the same questions of procedure are involved in this case as in the case of State v. Daniel J. Whaley, ante, page 574. Therefore, on the authority of the last mentioned case, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Affirmed.