Opinion · Supreme Court of Kansas

Day v. Kansas City Pipe Line Co.

Day v. Kan. City Pipe Line Co., 82 Kan. 861 (Kan. 1910)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of Kansas
Jurisdiction
Kansas
Date
1910-06-11
Topic
general

Per Curiam: This is an action to cancel an oil-and-gas lease. It is claimed that the action can not be maintained for the reason that the plaintiff has an adequate remedy at law. The facts are sufficiently similar to the Howerton case to make it controlling here. This case is therefore reversed upon the authority of Howerton v. Gas Co., decided upon rehearing, ante, p. 367.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Day v. Kansas City Pipe Line Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions
Per Curiam:

This is an action to cancel an oil-and-gas lease. It is claimed that the action can not be maintained for the reason that the plaintiff has an adequate remedy at law. The facts are sufficiently similar to the Howerton case to make it controlling here. This case is therefore reversed upon the authority of Howerton v. Gas Co., decided upon rehearing, ante, p. 367.