Opinion · Oregon Supreme Court
Picray v. Secretary of State
Picray v. Sec’y of State, 325 Or. 279 (Or. 1997)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Oregon Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Oregon
- Date
- 1997-04-29
- Topic
- bankruptcy
936 P.2d 974 (1997) 325 Or. 279 David PICRAY, Respondent on Review, v. SECRETARY OF STATE, Petitioner on Review. CA A85293; SC S43537. Supreme Court of Oregon. Argued and Submitted January 17, 1997.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Picray v. Secretary of State. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
David PICRAY, Respondent on Review,
v.
SECRETARY OF STATE, Petitioner on Review.
CA A85293; SC S43537.
Supreme Court of Oregon.
Argued and Submitted January 17, 1997. Decided April 29, 1997.Rives Kistler, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the petition were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.
David C. Force, Eugene, argued the cause and filed a response for respondent on review.
Before CARSON, C.J., and GILLETTE, VAN HOOMISSEN, FADELEY, GRABER and DURHAM, JJ.[**]
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed by an equally divided court. The order of the Secretary of State is reversed.
NOTES
[**] Kulongoski, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.