Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 325 Or. 367 (1997)

325 Or. 367

Type
Opinion
Court
Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction
Orlaw
Date
1997-01-01
Topic
general

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 325 Or. 367 (1997) PETITIONS FOR REVIEW (939 P.2d 43)Oregon Supreme Court. 1997. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ALLOWED May 20, 1997 Alderman v. Davidson (A91510) (S44089) (146 Or. App. 282) Armstrong v. Rogue Federal Credit Union (A89715) (S43980) (145 Or. App. 268) SAIF Corporation and Gold Creek Center, Inc. v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 325 Or. 367 (1997). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW,325 Or. 367(1997)
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW(939 P.2d 43)
Oregon Supreme Court.
1997.
ALLOWED
May 20, 1997
Alderman v. Davidson (A91510) (S44089) (146 Or. App. 282)

Armstrong v. Rogue Federal Credit Union (A89715) (S43980) (145 Or. App. 268)

SAIF Corporation and Gold Creek Center, Inc. v. Walker (A89100) (S44116) (145 Or. App. 294)

State v. Manley, Walter Lee, Jr. (A92516) (S44187) (147 Or. App. 244)

State v. Meade, James Penny, Jr. (A90793) (S44069) (146 Or. App. 202)

State v. Rangel, Eduardo Tinoco (A91166) (S44151) (146 Or. App. 571)

State v. Stevens, Dallas Ray (A94916) (S44065) (on dismissal)

Thompson v. Coughlin (A87937) (S43847) (144 Or. App. 348)

Wyatt v. Sweitz (A91998) (S44160) (146 Or. App. 723) (petition of Wyatt),appeal dismissed326 Or. 63.
May 27, 1997
Glithero and Glithero (A90270) (S44118) (146 Or. App. 398)

Michels v. Hodges / Open Adoption Family Services, Inc., and Lippitt (A88794) (S44137) (146 Or. App. 128)

Moore and Moore (A91175) (S44155) (146 Or. App. 661)

Sleeper and Sleeper (A89844) (S43959) (145 Or. App. 165). Appellant's petition for reconsideration granted; order denying petition for review March 4, 1997 (325 Or. 45)

withdrawn; petition for review allowed.
(939 P.2d 44)
DENIED
May 20, 1997
Bear Creek Corporation v. Thornburg (A94114) (S44117) (146 Or. App. 520)

Belcher, Fredrick Douglas v. Armenakis (A91931) (S44183) (147 Or. App. 241)

Bruso, David Eif v. Baldwin (A90496) (S44021) (145 Or. App. 548)

Cervantes, Juan Solario v. Baldwin (A90628) (S44098) (146 Or. App. 520)

Crane v. Drahn (A79663) (S44172) (145 Or. App. 603)

Department of Human Resources v. Hussey and Green (A91197) (S44034) (145 Or. App. 482)

Devine, Danny v. Maass (A93048) (S44184) (147 Or. App. 241)

Drummond, Paul Steven v. Thompson (A91555) (A91578) (S44108) (146 Or. App. 520)

Estremado v. Jackson County (A95538) (S44138) (146 Or. App. 529)

Independent Contractors of Oregon v. Kulongoski (A92762) (S44076) (146 Or. App. 519)

Lincoln County v. Warncke (A87407) (S44214) (146 Or. App. 777)

Malafouris v. Sanders (A92359) (S44178) (147 Or. App. 241)

McClintock, Carmen v. Hoyt (A91512) (S43976) (145 Or. App. 603)

McClure, Robert Anthony v. Maass (A89062) (S43911) (143 Or. App. 360)

Meadows, Kent L. v. Schiedler (A93212) (S44131) (146 Or. App. 777). Van Hoomissen and Fadeley, JJ., would allow.

Miller, Lamont v. Baldwin (A91294) (S44036) (145 Or. App. 603)

Morgan, Shane A. v. Maass (A88490) (S44123) (144 Or. App. 328)

Mustola, Philip v. Maass (A89903) (S43989) (143 Or. App. 360)

Nimz, Richard v. Mazur-Hart (A93322) (S44048) (146 Or. App. 520)

Poddar v. Clatsop County (A95077) (S44074) (145 Or. App. 484)

Prince, Jonathan D. v. Maass (A89103) (S44087) (145 Or. App. 548)

Reeves, Anthony I. v. Johnson (A89448) (S43897) (145 Or. App. 162)Page 368
  1. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩