Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 321 Or. 246 (1995)

321 Or. 246

Type
Opinion
Court
Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction
Orlaw
Date
1995-01-01
Topic
general

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 321 Or. 246 (1995) PETITIONS FOR REVIEW (895 P.2d 786)Oregon Supreme Court. 1995. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ALLOWED May 23, 1995 State v. K.P. (A84028) (S42148) (133 Or. App. 256) DENIED May 23, 1995 Asplundh Tree Expert Company v. Hart (A77409) (S42150) (132 Or.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 321 Or. 246 (1995). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW,321 Or. 246(1995)
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW(895 P.2d 786)
Oregon Supreme Court.
1995.
ALLOWED
May 23, 1995
State v. K.P. (A84028) (S42148) (133 Or. App. 256)
DENIED
May 23, 1995
Asplundh Tree Expert Company v. Hart (A77409) (S42150) (132 Or. App. 494) . Graber, J., would allow.

Broadway Deluxe Cab Company v. National Council on Compensation Insurance, the filings of (A71182) (S42179) (133 Or. App. 324)

Lake v. Motor Vehicles Division (A84784) (S42234) (133 Or. App. 550)

Nulph, George W. v. Maass (A83795) (S42233) (133 Or. App. 258)

Severy, Donald M. v. Maass (A84194) (S42209) (133 Or. App. 600)

Shipp v. County of Multnomah (A82275) (S42207) (133 Or. App. 583). Fadeley, J., would allow.

State v. Crapo, Michael Alan (A82651) (S42239) (133 Or. App. 604)

State v. Darcell, Leonard Benjamin III (A83533) (S42224) (133 Or. App. 602)

State v. Fox, Joseph Scott (A82982) (S42257) (133 Or. App. 604)

Stull, Barry Joe v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (A80941) (S42254) (133 Or. App. 604)

Templeton, Mark Forrest v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (A82630) (S42199) (133 Or. App. 604)

United Employer Benefit Corporation v. Department of Insurance and Finance (A77744) (S42230) (133 Or. App. 477)
May 30, 1995
City of Portland v. City of Beaverton and Washington County (A84260) (A84261) (S42093) (131 Or. App. 630) (City of Beaverton's petition). Van Hoomissen, J., would allow.

City of Portland v. City of Beaverton and Washington County (A84260) (A84261) (S42094) (131 Or. App. 630) (Washington County's petition). Van Hoomissen, J., would allow.

Holterman, Daniel v. Maass (A84292) (S42232) (133 Or. App. 600)

Jackson v. Tuality Community Hospital (A80451) (S42268) (132 Or. App. 182)

McComas v. Employment Department (A85113) (S42243) (133 Or. App. 577)

Palacios, Antonio S. v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (A75545) (A76804) (S42013) (132 Or. App. 243) (petition filed by counsel and supplementalpro sepetition)

Peters v. Barker (A85416) (S42272) (133 Or. App. 603)

Saunders v. Preston Petty Products Company (A84818) (S42251) (133 Or. App. 602)

State v. Amsden, Paul Charles (A82868) (S42264) (133 Or. App. 603)

State v. Dykeman, Robert Edwin (A82263) (S42238) (133 Or. App. 604)

State v. Smith, Michael Lee (A83825) (S42248) (133 Or. App. 604)

State v. Wilson, Philip Bruce (A80091) (S42274) (133 Or. App. 448)

Wimber, Larry v. Mill Creek Correctional Facility, Corrections Department (A84091) (S42249) (133 Or. App. 602)Page 247
  1. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩