Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 320 Or. 507 (1995)

PETITIONS FOR Rev., 320 Or. 507 (1995), 320 Or. 507 (Or. 1995)

Type
Opinion
Court
Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction
Orlaw
Date
1995-01-01
Topic
general

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 320 Or. 507 (1995) PETITIONS FOR REVIEW (888 P.2d 568)Oregon Supreme Court. 1995. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ALLOWED January 24, 1995 Scovill v. City of Astoria (A75790) (S41871) (130 Or. App. 425) DENIED January 24, 1995 Alaniz, Lorenzo Silva v. Gates (A79209) (S41881) (130 Or. App. 215) Annen, Todd R. v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 320 Or. 507 (1995). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW,320 Or. 507(1995)
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW(888 P.2d 568)
Oregon Supreme Court.
1995.
ALLOWED
January 24, 1995
Scovill v. City of Astoria (A75790) (S41871) (130 Or. App. 425)
DENIED
January 24, 1995
Alaniz, Lorenzo Silva v. Gates (A79209) (S41881) (130 Or. App. 215)

Annen, Todd R. v. Oregon State Correctional Institution, Corrections Department (A82802) (S41904) (130 Or. App. 679)

Augustyn and Augustyn (A81754) (S41917) (131 Or. App. 508)

Beck, Allan C. v. Baldwin (A83762) (S41844) (131 Or. App. 362)

Boyd and Boyd (A82635) (S41843) (131 Or. App. 194)

Brand v. Good Samaritan Hospital (A73686) (S41200) (125 Or. App. 586)

Brett v. City of Eugene (A80814) (S41769) (130 Or. App. 53). Fadeley, J., would allow.

Brown, Jarrod v. Baldwin (A82391) (S41873) (131 Or. App. 356)

Business Men's Service Co. v. Obrist (A79918) (S41771) (130 Or. App. 577)

Buss, Robert Ardell v. Maass (A78340) (S41807) (129 Or. App. 598)

Capps and Capps (A83543) (S41925) (131 Or. App. 508)

City of Portland v. Roth (A66485) (S41770) (130 Or. App. 179)

DeCair and DeCair (A81632) (S41916) (131 Or. App. 413)

Dempsey v. Oremet (A73311) (S41201) (125 Or. App. 587)

Ewing-Swearingen v. Employment Division (A80537) (S41886) (131 Or. App. 331)

Fechtig v. City of Albany (A84992) (S41755) (130 Or. App. 433)

Foxworth v. Emanuel Hospital Health Center and Huston (A78884) (S41896) (131 Or. App. 110)

Garganese v. Oregon Department of Justice (A75892) (S41819) (131 Or. App. 267)

Garrett v. II Morrow Inc. (A82151) (S41892) (130 Or. App. 678)

Grage and Grage (A77117) (S41842) (131 Or. App. 158)

Higgins, David E. v. Baldwin (A82444) (S41815) (130 Or. App. 679)

Lane County v. Adkins and Schermerhorn (A82104) (S41897) (131 Or. App. 363)

Libbett v. Roseburg Forest Products (A81988) (S41831) (130 Or. App. 50)

Luisi and Luisi (A81510) (S41761) (130 Or. App. 514)

Mayton, Charles Lyle v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison

Supervision (A78991) (S41810) (131 Or. App. 269)

McAlpine v. Multnomah County and City of Portland (A80998) (S41836) (131 Or. App. 136)

Messmer v. Deluxe Cabinet Works (A79805) (S41880) (130 Or. App. 254)

Nelson, Randolph Del Calhoun v. Maass (A83000) (S41816) (131 Or. App. 267)

Otterness v. City of Waldport (A78826) (S41809) (130 Or. App. 550)

Poepping, Robert A. v. Oregon State Correctional Institution, Corrections Department (A83377) (S41869) (131 Or. App. 363)

Ritcherson, Fred Henry v. State of Oregon (A82396) (S41876) (131 Or. App. 183)

SAIF v. Williamson (A80654) (S41796) (130 Or. App. 391). Carson, C. J. and Graber, J., would allow.

Samayoa v. Greenwood Inn (A76464) (S41209) (126 Or. App. 261)Page 508
  1. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩