Opinion · Oregon Supreme Court
McKenzie v. Pacific Health & Life Insurance
318 Or. 476
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Oregon Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Oregon
- Date
- 1994-03-24
- Topic
- estate-planning
How later courts describe this case
- specific amount of economic damages must be pleaded
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed McKenzie v. Pacific Health & Life Insurance. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 7 opinions
review dismissed as improvidently allowed March 24, 1994
Max A. McKENZIE and Debra A. McKenzie, Respondents on Review, v. PACIFIC HEALTH & LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Oregon corporation, Petitioner on Review.
Martin E. Hansen, of Karnopp, Petersen, Noteboom, Hubei, Hansen & Arnett, Bend, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the petition were Howard G. Arnett and Brian L. Gingerich, Bend.
W. Eugene Hallman, of Mautz, Hallman, Pendleton, argued the cause and filed the response for respondents on review.
Bruce J. Brothers, of Brothers, Drew & Steelhammer, Bend, filed a brief amicus curiae on behalf of Oregon Trial Lawyers Association.