Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 317 Or. 485 (1993)

317 Or. 485

Type
Opinion
Court
Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction
Orlaw
Date
1993-01-01
Topic
general

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 317 Or. 485 (1993) PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED (858 P.2d 875)Oregon Supreme Court. 1993. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ALLOWED August 24, 1993 City of Eugene v. Miller (A75143) (A47145) (S40396) (119 Or. App. 293) Garganese v. Oregon Department of Justice (A75892) (S39946) (on order determining jurisdiction) Ristau v. Wescold, Inc.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 317 Or. 485 (1993). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW,317 Or. 485(1993)
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED(858 P.2d 875)
Oregon Supreme Court.
1993.
ALLOWED
August 24, 1993
City of Eugene v. Miller (A75143) (A47145) (S40396) (119 Or. App. 293)

Garganese v. Oregon Department of Justice (A75892) (S39946) (on order determining jurisdiction)

Ristau v. Wescold, Inc. (A73177) (S40351) (120 Or. App. 264)

State v. Cervantes, Antonio Mendoza (A68493) (S40204) (118 Or. App. 429)

Vendall Marketing Corp. v. Oregon Department of Justice (A76681) (S40322) (120 Or. App. 537)
DENIED
August 24, 1993
Allen, Edward E. v. Maass (A76107) (S40339) (120 Or. App. 631)

Baker v. Marion County (A78828) (S40312) (120 Or. App. 50)

Bruni v. Thacker (A72804) (S40392) (120 Or. App. 560)

Butler v. Joyce (A72663) (S40326) (120 Or. App. 536)

Castillo, Joseph B. v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (A74140) (S40361) (119 Or. App. 513)

Churchill and Churchill (A75706) (S40171) (118 Or. App. 748)

City of Clatskanie v. Carr (A72870/71) (S40164) (119 Or. App. 174)

Clevenger v. Cronk (A77239) (S40380) (120 Or. App. 633)

Daughetee v. Pacific Machine and Tool (A75696) (S40327) (120 Or. App. 536)

Durham v. McCann (A74734) (S40309) (120 Or. App. 137)

Hallford v. Smith (A69472) (S40382) (120 Or. App. 57)

Harvey, William Donald v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (A73196) (A76852) (S40335) (119 Or. App. 513)

Heintz v. Baxter (A72600) (S40393) (120 Or. App. 603)

Hull, Joseph Ernest v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (A74137) (S40336) (119 Or. App. 513)

Kouno v. Oregon State Board of Higher Education (A72947) (S40321) (119 Or. App. 512)

Mahler v. Thrasher (A71726) (S40301) (120 Or. App. 536)

Moore v. Ball, Janik Novack (A73705) (S40397) (120 Or. App. 466). Peterson and Van Hoomissen, JJ., would allow.

Morrison, Patrick Hugh v. Zenon (A74482) (S40372) (119 Or. App. 510)

Poepping, Robert Alan v. Board of Parole (A68318) (A71257) (S40332) (120 Or. App. 631)

Pyburn v. Hammond (A76469) (S40341) (120 Or. App. 537). Carson, C.J. and Fadeley, J., would allow.Page 486
  1. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩