Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 313 Or. 74 (1992)

313 Or. 74

Type
Opinion
Court
Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction
Orlaw
Date
1992-01-01
Topic
general

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 313 Or. 74 (1992) PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED (828 P.2d 457)Oregon Supreme Court. 1992. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ALLOWED March 24, 1992 International Paper Co. v. Hubbard (A65248) (S38715) (109 Or. App. 452) Scott v. Francis (A46646) (S37071) (100 Or. App. 392) (Lopez's petition) State v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 313 Or. 74 (1992). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW,313 Or. 74(1992)
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED(828 P.2d 457)
Oregon Supreme Court.
1992.
ALLOWED
March 24, 1992
International Paper Co. v. Hubbard (A65248) (S38715) (109 Or. App. 452)

Scott v. Francis (A46646) (S37071) (100 Or. App. 392) (Lopez's petition)

State v. McVay, Paul Anthony (A67951) (S38892) (110 Or. App. 635)

Stringer v. Car Data Systems, Inc. (A65113) (S38792) (110 Or. App. 14)
DENIED
March 24, 1992
Alexander, Kevin v. Zenon (A67487) (S38870) (110 Or. App. 373)

Alvarez, Alex v. OSCI (A68810) (S38804) (110 Or. App. 151)

Bigej v. Boyer (A61616) (S38595) (108 Or. App. 663)

Bouchard, Michael v. Zenon (A66520) (S38609) (109 Or. App. 75)

Cross, Christopher v. Board of Parole (A65998) (S38682) (109 Or. App. 330)

Dalrymple v. Department of Transportation (A68557) (S38893) (109 Or. App. 329)

Davis, Albert R. v. Maass (A68291) (S38833) (110 Or. App. 370)

Farmers Ins. Co. of Oregon v. Paepier (A65205) (S38812) (110 Or. App. 77) Unis, J., would allow.

Goss v. Diamond Fruit Growers (A69026) (S38797) (110 Or. App. 151)

Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Bleka (A69447) (S38943) (110 Or. App. 370)

Johnson, Ellis v. Maass (A67260) (S38664) (109 Or. App. 220)

Kenny, Ralph R. v. Maass (A69320) (S38882) (110 Or. App. 632)

Kimmel, James Russell v. Maass (A67630) (S38935) (110 Or. App. 632)

Martz, Sammie J. v. Maass (A67137) (S38887) (110 Or. App. 391)

McClure, Philip Wade v. Maass (A66008) (A66410) (S38811) (110 Or. App. 119)

McManus v. Roseburg Disposal Co. (A69294) (S38897) (110 Or. App. 632)

Moore v. MVD (A65351) (S38813) (109 Or. App. 195)

Neal v. United Finance Co. (A69955) (S38961) (110 Or. App. 634)

Palmer v. Johnston (A66875) (S38931) (110 Or. App. 538)

Potter, Charles A. v. Zenon (A68270) (S38679) (109 Or. App. 328)

Rodriguez-Micias, Secondino v. Maass (A67209) (S38914) (110 Or. App. 633)

Rostad v. Mametieff (A67494) (S38969) (107 Or. App. 531)

Rykoff-Sexton, Inc. v. DSJ Enterprises, Inc. (A69502) (S38856) (110 Or. App. 372)

Sager, Donald v. Maass (A67826) (S38788) (110 Or. App. 371)

Schacher v. Dunne (A65516) (S38752) (109 Or. App. 607). Unis, J., would allow.

Simich, Ralph M. v. Maass (A68606) (S38791) (110 Or. App. 151)

State ex rel Juvenile Department of Lane County v. Long (A70450/51) (S38810) (110 Or. App. 371)Page 75
  1. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩