Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 313 Or. 627 (1992)

313 Or. 627

Type
Opinion
Court
Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction
Orlaw
Date
1992-01-01
Topic
general

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 313 Or. 627 (1992) PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED (835 P.2d 916, 917Oregon Supreme Court. 1992. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ALLOWED July 21, 1992 Hansen v. Abrasive Engineering and Manufacturing, Inc. (A61214) (S39226) (112 Or. App. 586) (Abrasive Engineering's petition) Hardt v. Columbia Plywood (A64214) (S39149) (111 Or.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 313 Or. 627 (1992). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW,313 Or. 627(1992)
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED(835 P.2d 916, 917
Oregon Supreme Court.
1992.
ALLOWED
July 21, 1992
Hansen v. Abrasive Engineering and Manufacturing, Inc. (A61214) (S39226) (112 Or. App. 586) (Abrasive Engineering's petition)

Hardt v. Columbia Plywood (A64214) (S39149) (111 Or. App. 353)

Park v. Hoffard (A66742) (S39173) (111 Or. App. 340)

State v. Adams, Timothy Scott (A66738) (S39019) (110 Or. App. 434) (Adams' petition)

State v. Adams, Timothy Scott (A66738) (S39080) (110 Or. App. 434) (State's petition)

State v. Wimber, Larry Floyd (A66481) (S38863) (109 Or. App. 703)

Teeny v. Haertl Constructors, Inc. (A63888) (S39122) (111 Or. App. 543) (Camera World's petition)
DENIED
July 21, 1992
Benefiel v. Waremart, Inc. (A70262) (S39318) (112 Or. App. 480)

Elardo v. Tektronix, Inc. (A66176) (S39193) (112 Or. App. 221). Unis, J., would allow.

Garrett v. State Farm Mutual Ins. Co. (A69224) (S39290) (112 Or. App. 539)

Guthrie v. Support Enforcement Division (A66609) (S38942) (110 Or. App. 622)

Harvey and Harvey (A71644) (S39253) (112 Or. App. 662)

Higgins v. Schramm Plastics (A70249) (S39291) (112 Or. App. 563)

Latimer, Rex Michael v. Wright (A64609) (S39076) (110 Or. App. 632)

McFarland, Gary Ray v. Board of Parole (A67648) (S39316) (112 Or. App. 325)

Oregon State Bar v. Wright (A70697) (S39238) (112 Or. App. 661)

Pointer and Pointer (A66054) (S39313) (112 Or. App. 511) San Ysidro Associates III v. Cambridge East, Ltd. (A62426-28) (S39209) (111 Or. App. 496) (San Ysidro Associates' petition)

Shlim v. CML, Inc. (A64066) (S39301) (112 Or. App. 597). Graber, J., would allow.

Smith v. Custom Micro, Inc. (A63887) (S39264) (112 Or. App. 662)

Smith v. O'Byrne (A70036) (S39358) (113 Or. App. 128)

Spinks v. Mosley and Sons (A70613) (S39255) (112 Or. App. 661)

State v. Bursott, David Michael (A70492) (S39188) (111 Or. App. 665). Unis, J., would allow.

State v. Dickerson, Thomas Cardell (A62457) (S39108) (112 Or. App. 51) Unis, J., would allow.

State v. Eckert, Vernon Howard (A71304-06) (S39267) (112 Or. App. 662)

State v. Enderlin, Randy Allan (A68196) (S39304) (112 Or. App. 664)

State v. Fortune, Mark (A66801) (S39299) (112 Or. App. 247). Unis, J., would allow.

State v. Fox, Michael Del (A63574) (S38631) (109 Or. App. 53) (Fox's petition)

State v. Fox, Michael Del (A63574) (S39252) (111 Or. App. 362) (Fox's petition)

State v. Hubbard, Christian Mathew (A68539) (S39033) (111 Or. App. 402)

State v. Hunter, Betty Jean (A66748) (S39224) (112 Or. App. 158)

State v. James, Laura Ellen (A66254-56) (S39051) (111 Or. App. 432)

State v. Kemp, Bryan Neal; State v. Haworth, John David (A65542) (A65724) (S39292) (112 Or. App. 522)

State v. Kim, Sung Suk (A66433) (S39293) (111 Or. App. 539)

State v. McCluskey, William Roger (A70144) (S39335) (112 Or. App. 663)

State v. Quinn, Steven John (A62439) (S39278) (112 Or. App. 608). Unis, J., would allow.Page 628
  1. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩