Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 313 Or. 299 (1992)

PETITIONS FOR Rev., 313 Or. 299 (1992), 313 Or. 299 (Or. 1992)

Type
Opinion
Court
Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction
Orlaw
Date
1992-01-01
Topic
general

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 313 Or. 299 (1992) PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED (832 P.2d 455)Oregon Supreme Court. 1992. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ALLOWED May 26, 1992 Columbia Commerce Park Partners v. Riedel (A72260) (S38972) (on dismissal) Gill v. SAIF Corporation (A65889) (S38998) (110 Or. App. 533) State v. Barkley, Craig Michael (A62773) (S38781) (108 Or.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 313 Or. 299 (1992). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW,313 Or. 299(1992)
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED(832 P.2d 455)
Oregon Supreme Court.
1992.
ALLOWED
May 26, 1992
Columbia Commerce Park Partners v. Riedel (A72260) (S38972) (on dismissal)

Gill v. SAIF Corporation (A65889) (S38998) (110 Or. App. 533)

State v. Barkley, Craig Michael (A62773) (S38781) (108 Or. App. 756) (Barkley's petition)

State v. Barkley, Craig Michael (A62773) (S38874) (108 Or. App. 756) (State's petition)

State v. Phillips, Stacey Scott (A69963) (S39138) (112 Or. App. 158)

State v. Wyatt, Vincent Lee (A64436) (S38844) (109 Or. App. 699),petition for review dismissed(314 Or. 177)

Westfall v. Rust International (A62442) (S39025) (111 Or. App. 289)
DENIED
May 26, 1992
Abbott v. West Extension Irrigation District (A61651) (S38994) (110 Or. App. 385)

Alexander, Willie D. v. Maass (A69722) (S39126) (111 Or. App. 667)

Allen v. City of Gresham Police Department (A69019) (S39073) (111 Or. App. 666)

Anthony v. Electrical Board (A69760) (S38963) (110 Or. App. 151)

Barlow and Barlow (A65421) (S39059) (111 Or. App. 179)

Bewley v. Evanite Fiber Corporation (A68484) (S39045) (111 Or. App. 314)

Bible Temple v. Employment Division (A67126) (A67130) (S38900) (110 Or. App. 148)

Chaney v. Shell Oil Company (A65819) (S39118) (111 Or. App. 556). Fadeley and Graber, JJ., would allow.

Cheever, James A. v. Maass (A69198) (S39049) (111 Or. App. 451)

Drake and Drake (A67638) (S38890) (110 Or. App. 138). Van Hoomissen, J., would allow.

Gerke v. Burton Enterprises (A68061) (S39119) (111 Or. App. 613)

Giba, David Michael v. Board of Parole (A67507) (S39150) (112 Or. App. 157)

Gilbert v. Tektronix, Inc. (A65073) (S39168) (112 Or. App. 34)

Guzek, Joel C. v. State Board of Parole (A61486) (S39081) (111 Or. App. 667)

Harris, Franklin v. Maass (A65228) (S39110) (111 Or. App. 666)

Hiskey v. Hamilton and Doe (A66382) (S39028) (111 Or. App. 39). Van Hoomissen and Graber, JJ., would allow.

Lapping v. Hamilton Construction Co. (A70325) (S39040) (110 Or. App. 632)

Lawver v. Beesley (A67785) (S39101) (111 Or. App. 666)

Logan v. Tillamook County Parks (A67296) (S38982) (110 Or. App. 151)

M M Reforestation Limited v. SAIF (A67569) (S38836) (110 Or. App. 370)

Marshall, William C. v. Maass (A69632) (S38983) (111 Or. App. 134)

Moreno, Luis Diaz v. Maass (A69118) (S39113) (111 Or. App. 666)

Murphy, Robert Doyle v. Board of Parole (A70497) (S39029) (111 Or. App. 666) 1000 Friends of Oregon v. LCDC (Forestry/Trans.) (A68782/83) (S39095) (111 Or. App. 491)

Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company v. Eachus and Citizens' Utility Board (A65756) (S39105) (111 Or. App. 551)

Pieretti and Pieretti (A61758) (S39087) (110 Or. App. 166)

Powell, Anthony L. v. Zenon (A69721) (S39131) (111 Or. App. 667)Page 300
  1. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩