Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED, 312 Or. 525 (1991)

312 Or. 525

Type
Opinion
Court
Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction
Orlaw
Date
1991-11-26
Topic
general

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED, 312 Or. 525 (1991) PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED (822 P.2d 1194)Oregon Supreme Court. November 26, 1991. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ALLOWED Kilgore v. People's Savings Loan Association (A61609) (S38336) (107 Or. App. 743) Oberg v. Honda Motor Co.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED, 312 Or. 525 (1991). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED,312 Or. 525(1991)
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED(822 P.2d 1194)
Oregon Supreme Court.
November 26, 1991.
ALLOWED
Kilgore v. People's Savings Loan Association (A61609) (S38336) (107 Or. App. 743)

Oberg v. Honda Motor Co. (A61587) (S38436) (108 Or. App. 43)

State v. Hendrix, Shawn Wayne (A65065) (S38384) (107 Or. App. 734)

State v. Plowman, Darin Dale (A65145) (S38328) (107 Or. App. 782)

Stevens v. Bispham (A64459) (S38574) (108 Or. App. 588)

Tee v. Albertsons, Inc. (A64558) (S38437) (107 Or. App. 638)
DENIED
November 26, 1991
Accident Prevention Division v. Nelson Logging, Inc. (A66042) (S38304) (107 Or. App. 71)

Archdiocese of Portland in Oregon v. Employment Division (A67153) (S38524) (108 Or. App. 495). Van Hoomissen, J., would allow.

Argonaut Ins. Companies v. Johnson (A66813) (S38468) (108 Or. App. 365)

Belt and Belt (A66144) (S38504) (108 Or. App. 366)

Black Bull Enterprises v. Hall (A64150) (S38367) (107 Or. App. 754)

Caudle, Wade W. v. Board of Parole (A65840) (A65854) (S38423) (108 Or. App. 340)

Collar v. SAIF Corporation (A67188) (S38481) (108 Or. App. 366)

Collier, Michael v. Maass (A67739) (S38396) (107 Or. App. 783)

Davis, Therell Tyrone v. Maass (A66955) (S38519) (108 Or. App. 575)

Dyer, Scott Warnock v. Zenon (A66315) (S38615) (109 Or. App. 75)

Evonuk v. Shekell (A65504) (S38395) (108 Or. App. 194). Fadeley, J., would allow.

Gathman v. Madsen (A67373) (S38596) (108 Or. App. 364)

Gilman v. Midway Plant Farm, Inc. (A64119) (S38447) (107 Or. App. 382)

Goddard v. Munson (A64772) (S38490) (108 Or. App. 342)

Halling v. Employment Division (A67212) (S38605) (108 Or. App. 457) Van Hoomissen, J., would allow.

Harris, Franklin v. Maass (A67131) (S38491) (108 Or. App. 366)

Haynes, Robert M. v. Board of Parole (A65769) (S38421) (108 Or. App. 340)

Henry, James Leroy v. Zenon (A65632) (S38492) (108 Or. App. 365)

Hines, Raymond C. v. Maass (A68679) (S38453) (108 Or. App. 575)

Honore, Joseph M. v. Board of Parole (A63151) (S38461) (108 Or. App. 194)

Kendrick, William v. Maass (A66903) (S38417) (108 Or. App. 367)

Kerns v. Guido-Lee (A64496) (S38506) (107 Or. App. 721)

Little, Dwain v. Maass (A66050) (S38616) (109 Or. App. 75)

Lockard and Lockard (A48348) (S38516) (108 Or. App. 388)

Maidel and Maidel (A67518) (S38598) (108 Or. App. 702). Van Hoomissen and Fadeley, JJ., would allow.

McCarthy, Kent J. v. Maass (A65346) (S38483) (108 Or. App. 367)

McIntyre v. Sacred Heart Hospital (A66973) (S38599) (108 Or. App. 366)

McQuiggin v. Milwaukie Floral (A67737) (S38469) (108 Or. App. 365)

Moody v. Liberty Northwest Ins. (A66568) (S38337) (108 Or. App. 101)Page 526
  1. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩